People without the internet will be the biggest problem in society for others and themselves. Lion’s share or aten…

Jiska Hachmer
11 min readDec 4, 2019

--

They in point of fact already are the biggest problem, some even living in the myth the internet is bad. But they do not know what they do or say, they just assume, and follow a group that was not so good at science. Or, a group that did not have the best science. Or, a group not exposed to the best sciences to come up with the truth.

We can put these people into two groups:

  • Myths, bias, DSM, or opinions.
  • Poor, denied access to the internet, not capable to use, or not taught to use the internet.

They both miss health, and access to information about health, and will not be trained in health, like the rest of society online, through mass media. (Wakefield, Loken, Hornik, 2014) The use of mass media is the best way to change bad behavior related to health. Being online makes you more healthy.

We can say these groups miss hygiene. They do not take care of this part of humanity.

Also, this is very old, when I was a teen we were taught to use the internet, because learned how to use the internet, will address children.

  • It will create familiarity (Peer, 2015).
  • And will address the mind (Robson, 2019).
  • It trains the mind, to learn the behavior for several weeks, trains the student a habit (Clear, N.D.)
  • We got training closely to the cognitive we already had, we were trained, step by step (Owen, et.al., 2010), and (Smith, N.D.).

Outside “on the streets” judging the things they see wrongly.

Outside on the streets talking about what they see, not knowing what they see or judge, but they will judge. The outside is what some only see and know. Also, “outside” groups online. Outside the knowledge. The internet is one big schooling. One big meeting place where we share. Everyone can add information and everything we can find there.

If you can not find the page with information that is online, and you need it, it is like being homeless, not finding your home.

All comes down to, do you know if all you need is online? Can you find all the information?

There is more online, then one person can read and process. The amount of data does have a lot of valuable information. There are universities online, researchers online, doctors online, and a lot of experts online. You know the number of people online is a few billion, those are not the ones without knowledge, but everyone is online, also the ones with knowledge. And, everyone has a job, everyone studies, you can measure how much you can miss if you measure how many people are online, and how much smarter than you are online.

We were taught to be online in our teen years, at the end of the nineties and beginning of 2000, because the internet was the future and everyone knew we now had to fill the internet with knowledge. So, all students were taught how to use the internet, and how to create homepages, and add knowledge online. In the 20 years of every year new students, we know everyone is online and shares knowledge.

People who missed this understanding don’t understand what we do online with all schools, and all students, and all experts.

You miss out when not online, and it is like being homeless.

Homepage homeless

The ones not adding studies online.

Community homeless

The ones not finding communities with knowledge, or no community at all. Also, not able to build their own community.

Friends homelessness

Online you find more compatible people, than in person. (Lebowitz, 2017)

Because of the myths and brainwash, homelessness in many ways.

Not deeply themselves, not understanding depth in others, always on the surface. Outside the real world, while walking on the streets, in the harshness of being outside, and not within the group, being in a group is not literally being in a building together. It is the abstract and compatible ideas we talk about that bind us. You need to have communication to communicate and have a conversation.

Outside these groups, you guess what people think, and are, and do. You will interpret the body language but never get feedback, never get the addressing of what you think. Outside the group is assuming.

Also, when you do have some friends, you have just some friends, when you are without the internet. You assume to know humanity, by knowing a few people of the 7 billion, and only the ones nearby. You know more when you communicate in more ways, and in places where you can find compatible deep people that communicate with you, and when you have more of what you “study”, humans.

If you want to know the people, you have to be online. There you see what they do, and very detailed. There you speak to a lot more people. Also, you process together a lot more information. People with the same interests, especially online, there are more people you meet with the same interests, share more deeply.

The small-minded group is still the same as being outside the real world, and Neglect.

Input is one of human rights. Not forced, but the own will and own found life. Own conscientious (Ruggiero, et. al, 2018).

Developing the self is well being. Autonom, authentic with your Unique self. (Santos, 2019)

People not authoritatively raising, are causing DSM( Joordens, N.D).

Neglect is abuse.

Children abused or neglected have lower IQ(The University of Queensland, 2010).

Neglect is abuse. Abused/ neglected have ‘less’ input and less input. Both ways of less, not as much, and less good input. It is different than healthy input.

Missing the internet is neglect, it is less and “less” information. Not as good, as online, and not as much as online.

F=M*A, and velocity.

The relevance of access to the internet is clear, and not even a point to debate. It is very near or already a scientific law that people need input to grow (Von Feurenbach, 1832). We only need the most sophisticated input, the best input to get the best output. Good vs bad does matter, but we need input, in any way to develop into something, good or bad. There is no development when there is no input. The thoughts of a human are mass, and the mass needs input to accelerate. The force human has when they are developed is caused by mass and acceleration. Acceleration and the brain, cause force. The force within from other people, the parents, cause acceleration. This acceleration and the brain of the child, become a force. If the parents have good input, the child will have a good output. The child raised authoritatively will be an equal adult, when grown.

The brain develops, and by input. Harder tasks cause IQ growth (Trei, 2007).

The brain is developing 28 years. After that creates side paths, “more ways to Rome”. The brain can still grow IQ, always, by doing harder tasks.

Authoritarian raising causes ODD and fear. Impulsive raising causes addictions. Neglect, causes neglect, a copy of the neglect, the lesser input.

You need authoritative raising to have the most sophisticated input and healthy brain development.

The human is autonomous and grows out to be a mature independent person and can choose themselves what is good input, to develop. The goal in human life is to be autonomous and choose themselves what is best.

Humans need access to the internet and can determine independently what is best. If you fear the crime rate will go up, you give all people higher education, which will drop the crime rate(Hjalmarsson, Lochner, 2012). If, online people can find that higher education, the internet is a way to higher education. So, it is what you make of the internet and the people. You can teach them how to use the internet, but they need access to it.

Missing ‘the dimension’

Missing the dimension we actually live in is dangerous.

Homo Sapiens are wise humans and need the right input to survive. We live as the longest specie ever, because we have art, the speech we can express with and handle more of the same kind than other humans and animals( Christian, and Baker, N.D.).

Expressing is the reason we still live. We always need to know what happens and what is best to do to live best. We can share the experiences we have about surviving and can express that too many others, so our kind lives.

People with no internet miss being normal, they miss acting normal with the possible tools. And miss out on input that explains the norm.

Having just a few people as your example of samples of the population is not having a sample. You need the real world and enough people to understand the real world and the people living in that real world. Also to create representative samples of that population.

A lot more people are just a variation of the world norm. Of what being human really is.

So you need to travel a lot to know the big real world, also in norms of behaving and talents and genes, etc. Online you can easily travel, and faster. You get the world, the same minute, and every minute.

The Internet brings the real world near. You can have a better idea of the total real world with the internet.

Especially because people depend on truth to survive and expressing truth creates bigger survival chances, the internet is very important.

It all depends on how you use the internet and if people publish the truth on there. The real world, the real science, the real proof, the real nature, the real people, the reality of everything is there!

“There are all these moments you think you won’t survive. But then you survive.’ — David Levithan

With all the information today, people survive because of the internet.

Most important on earth today is skilled to think of things that make you find the things you need online.

You need to know what humans are and need to know all humans and what the features and their needs are and you need to know how to think of the things human need. Science helps you find the truth about this while studying these topics about humans and while thinking of what humans could need.

Fear for screens and internet use is based on a myth.

You don’ t only keep away all health training for well-being by mass media, also the correlation between screen use and well-being is moderate and just like eating potatoes. You don’t debate if you eat food, you will eat, but it all depends on what you will eat. Also, internet addiction is a myth, only 0.4% have such, while all students need the internet even more than any other among the population for research and educational purposes (Gonzalez, 2019). Using the internet is important and outweighs the negative risks (University of Oxford, 2012). Online talking to friends, is giving support, stops depression and is good for other parts of well-being (Kraut and Burke, 2015).

References.

Robson, D. (7th of August, 2019) Why speaking to yourself in the third person makes you wiser. Aeon. Retrieved from https://aeon.co/ideas/why-speaking-to-yourself-in-the-third-person-makes-you-wiser

Clear, J. (N.D.) How Long Does it Actually Take to Form a New Habit? (Backed by Science.) JamesClear. Retrieved from https://jamesclear.com/new-habit

Owen, A. et al. (2010) Putting brain training to the test. NCBI. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2884087/

Peer, M. (2015) To reach beyond your limits by training your mind | Marisa Peer | TEDxKCS. Tedx Talks. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCv-ZBy6_yU&list=PL67ON7OC36_xWArXMjtwuKOao90IVYhyP&index=230&t=0s

Smith, N. (N.D.) Trans-Theoretical Model of Behaviour Change. Nathan Smith. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO80XyBDrl0

Wakefield, M. A., Loken, B., & Hornik, R. C. (2010). Use of mass media campaigns to change health behavior. The Lancet, 376(9748), 1261–1271. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248563/

Velicer, W, et.al. (1998) Dedicated to helping people change their behavior for living longer, healthier lives. HOME OF THE TRANSTHEORETICAL MODEL. The University of Rhode Island. Retrieved from

Lebowitz, S. (18th October 2017) Scientists think relationships that start online may have a huge advantage over relationships that start in real life. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/happy-marriage-online-dating-2017-10?international=true&r=US&IR=T

Ruggiero, R, Zermatten, J, Jaffé, P. (2018) Children’s Human Rights — An Interdisciplinary Introduction. The University of Geneva at Coursera. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/learn/childrens-rights

United Nations. (1946) Freedom of Information. Unesco. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/freedom-of-expression/freedom-of-information/

Santos, L. (2019) The science of well-being. Yale. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/learn/the-science-of-well-being

Joordens, S. (N.D.)Introduction to psychology. The University of Toronto. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/learn/introduction-psych

The University of Queensland (22nd of December, 2010) Children who were abused or neglected have lower IQ in teens. The University of Queensland. Retrieved from

Hachmer, J. (29th of July 2019) We are almost done to create Godsend human! Medium. Retrieved from

Von Feuerenbach e.a (1832) Kaspar Hauser: Beispiel eines Verbrechens am Seelenleben des Menschen. Germany: Ansbach: T.M. Dollfuss. Retrieved from

Christian, D. and Baker, D. (N.D. ) Big History: Connecting Knowledge. Macquarie University through Coursera. Retrieved from

Sociomed, M. (28th of June, 2016) THE EFFECT OF THE INTERNET ADDICTION ON THE INFORMATION-SEEKING BEHAVIOR OF THE POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS. NCBI. Retrieved from

Gonzalez, R. (14th of January, 2019) Screens Might Be as Bad for Mental Health as … Potatoes. Wired. Retrieved from

The University of Oxford. (30th of December, 2012) “Teenagers without Internet access at home are educationally disadvantaged, UK study suggests.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 30 December 2012. Retrieved from

Kraut, R., and Burke, M. (December 2015) Internet ­Use and Psychological Well-Being: Effects of Activity and Audience. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 58 №12, Pages 94–100 10.1145/2739043. Retrieved from

Trei, L. (7th of February, 2007) Fixed versus growth intelligence mindsets: It’s all in your head, Dweck says. Stanford news service. Retrieved from https://news.stanford.edu/pr/2007/pr-dweck-020707.html

Hjalmarsson, R., and Lochner, L. (2012) The impact of education on crime: International evidence. CESifo DICE Report. Retrieved from https://www.economics.handels.gu.se/digitalAssets/1439/1439011_49-55_research_lochner.pdf

--

--